People v. McComas

202 A.D. 782

This text of 202 A.D. 782 (People v. McComas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McComas, 202 A.D. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts, and new trial granted. Held, 1. That the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. 2. That the evidence of Dr. Tinker as to conversations between himself and Mrs. [783]*783Walters was inadmissible. (People v. Murphy, 101 N. Y. 126, 130.) 3. That comments were made by the presiding judge in the course of the trial which were prejudicial. All concur; Davis and Sears, JJ., upon the second and third grounds stated only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. . Murphy
4 N.E. 326 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccomas-nyappdiv-1922.