People v. McClurkin
89 A.D.3d 1039, 933 N.Y.2d 573
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McClurkin. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.3d 784 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published
Opinion
[1040]*1040Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that potentially nonfrivolous issues exist with respect to, inter alia, the denial of the defendant’s pro se application to withdraw his pleas of guilty (see People v Heffelfinger, 13 AD3d 648, 649 [2004]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McClurkin, 89 A.D.3d 1039, 933 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 1039 (People v. McClurkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Heffelfinger
13 A.D.3d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)