Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. McClurkin

People v. McClurkin

89 A.D.3d 1039, 933 N.Y.2d 573
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 1039 (People v. McClurkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McClurkin, 89 A.D.3d 1039, 933 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[1040]*1040Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that potentially nonfrivolous issues exist with respect to, inter alia, the denial of the defendant’s pro se application to withdraw his pleas of guilty (see People v Heffelfinger, 13 AD3d 648, 649 [2004]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Heffelfinger
13 A.D.3d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 1039, 933 N.Y.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcclurkin-nyappdiv-2011.