People v. McClain

2024 NY Slip Op 03250
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2024
Docket139 KA 22-01392
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 03250 (People v. McClain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McClain, 2024 NY Slip Op 03250 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v McClain (2024 NY Slip Op 03250)
People v Mcclain
2024 NY Slip Op 03250
Decided on June 14, 2024
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 14, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, MONTOUR, OGDEN, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

139 KA 22-01392

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

AJJA MCCLAIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


CAMBARERI & BRENNECK, SYRACUSE (MELISSA K. SWARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (ELISABETH A. DANNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Matthew J. Doran, J.), rendered August 4, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a guilty plea, of manslaughter in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her, upon a plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Albanese, 218 AD3d 1366, 1366-1367 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 995 [2023]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 14, 2024

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Albanese
192 N.Y.S.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 03250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcclain-nyappdiv-2024.