People v. McClain

281 A.D.2d 959, 722 N.Y.S.2d 442, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2785
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied due process because, prior to the hearing to determine whether he had violated the conditions of his probation, he did not receive notice of an additional allegation. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, it is lacking in merit. When defendant was arraigned, County Court stated in defendant’s presence that it would direct the Probation Department to include the additional allegation in the information of delinquency. When defendant thereafter appeared for the hearing, the court advised defendant of the contents of the amended information of delinquency and provided him with a copy. Although defendant indicated that he “did not believe” that he was prepared to proceed on the new allegation, defendant did not request an adjournment of the hearing (see, CPL 410.70 [2]). Thus, we conclude that there was no denial of defendant’s due process rights. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McClain, 281 A.D.2d 959, 722 N.Y.S.2d 442, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 959 (People v. McClain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. King
20 A.D.3d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Shaffer
289 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)