People v. McCarty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCarty

103 A.D.3d 1212, 958 N.Y.S.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.3d 1212 (People v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCarty, 103 A.D.3d 1212, 958 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered April 26, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver forecloses defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255-256; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered April 26, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver forecloses defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255-256; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.3d 1212, 958 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccarty-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack