People v. McCarthy
This text of 238 A.D.2d 357 (People v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered January 3, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the expert chemist’s testimony sufficiently established the. presence of cocaine in the substance bought by the undercover officer (see, People v McTootle, 197 AD2d 597; People v Garcia, 190 AD2d 749).
The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D.2d 357, 656 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccarthy-nyappdiv-1997.