People v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCarthy

178 A.D.2d 1029, 580 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18001

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 178 A.D.2d 1029 (People v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCarthy, 178 A.D.2d 1029, 580 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: In spite of our innumerable warnings that failure to comply with the provisions of 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) constitutes improper conduct of trial counsel, and in spite of the fact that forms complying with the rule have been made available to counsel through the assigned counsel administrators and the court clerks, many defense counsel in criminal cases continue to disregard the rule. We continue to remind trial counsel of the duty to comply with the rule and we urge the assigned counsel administrators, as well as the sentencing courts, to remind defense counsel in criminal cases to comply with rule [1030]*10301022.11 (a) at the time of sentencing. Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: In spite of our innumerable warnings that failure to comply with the provisions of 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) constitutes improper conduct of trial counsel, and in spite of the fact that forms complying with the rule have been made available to counsel through the assigned counsel administrators and the court clerks, many defense counsel in criminal cases continue to disregard the rule. We continue to remind trial counsel of the duty to comply with the rule and we urge the assigned counsel administrators, as well as the sentencing courts, to remind defense counsel in criminal cases to comply with rule [1030]*10301022.11 (a) at the time of sentencing. Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A.D.2d 1029, 580 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccarthy-nyappdiv-1991.