People v. McCarthy
159 A.D.2d 1024, 555 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3358
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The issues raised by defendant on this appeal were previously resolved on the appeal of a codefendant (see, People v Rogers, 152 AD2d 947, lv denied 74 NY2d 851). We add only that the hearsay statements of a codefendant were admissible at the suppression hearing (CPL 710.60 [4]; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 950, 951). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McCarthy, 159 A.D.2d 1024, 555 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
159 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gonzalez
502 N.E.2d 1001 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Rogers
152 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)