Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. McCarthy

People v. McCarthy

159 A.D.2d 1024, 555 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3358
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McCarthy, 159 A.D.2d 1024, 555 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The issues raised by defendant on this appeal were previously resolved on the appeal of a codefendant (see, People v Rogers, 152 AD2d 947, lv denied 74 NY2d 851). We add only that the hearsay statements of a codefendant were admissible at the suppression hearing (CPL 710.60 [4]; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 950, 951). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gonzalez
502 N.E.2d 1001 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Rogers
152 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A.D.2d 1024, 555 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccarthy-nyappdiv-1990.