People v. McCarthy
This text of 104 A.D.2d 713 (People v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By entering a plea of guilty to a violation of subdivision 2 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law as a felony, defendant waived his claim that the People were not ready for trial within the time prescribed by CPL 30.30 (People v Savage, 54 NY2d 697; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845).
While a plea of guilty entered under circumstances demonstrating a knowing and voluntary waiver of the constitutional right to a speedy trial may also operate as a waiver of that right (People v White, 32 NY2d 393, 399; People v Nelson, 79 AD2d 1093), it may not be said here that defendant’s conduct spelled out such a waiver (see People v Chirieleison, 3 NY2d 170, 173-174). His motion to dismiss on this ground was properly denied, [714]*714however, because his moving papers were factually and legally insufficient to support the claim (see People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442) and no hearing was required (see CPL 210.45, subd 5, par [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Mark, J. — driving while intoxicated.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 A.D.2d 713, 480 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccarthy-nyappdiv-1984.