People v. McCartha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCartha

267 A.D.2d 51, 699 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 51 (People v. McCartha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCartha, 267 A.D.2d 51, 699 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered September 2, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal represents a “decision not to invoke the court’s review power” (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10) concerning the alleged excessiveness of his sentence and thus forecloses review of that issue (People v Frazier, 228 AD2d 171, lv denied 89 NY2d 922). In any event, we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered September 2, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal represents a “decision not to invoke the court’s review power” (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10) concerning the alleged excessiveness of his sentence and thus forecloses review of that issue (People v Frazier, 228 AD2d 171, lv denied 89 NY2d 922). In any event, we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 51, 699 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccartha-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack