People v. McCarrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCarrick

265 A.D.2d 345, 696 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 345 (People v. McCarrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCarrick, 265 A.D.2d 345, 696 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered June 18, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (four counts), and assault in the second degree (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, 470.15 [5]).

[346]*346The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI