People v. McCargo
This text of 251 A.D.2d 600 (People v. McCargo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered July 11, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
There was no Brady violation (see, Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83) in the instant case since the People did not possess the material in question (see, People v Johnson, 195 AD2d 481).
The defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 600, 673 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccargo-nyappdiv-1998.