People v. McCants

2019 NY Slip Op 3620
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 2019
DocketInd. No. 16-00981
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3620 (People v. McCants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McCants, 2019 NY Slip Op 3620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v McCants (2019 NY Slip Op 03620)
People v McCants
2019 NY Slip Op 03620
Decided on May 8, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 8, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2017-11441
(Ind. No. 16-00981)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Karlton R. McCants, appellant.


Mark Diamond, New York, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (William C. Milaccio and Christine DiSalvo of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Susan M. Capeci, J.), rendered October 4, 2017, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to due process of law when the County Court did not a hold a hearing concerning his alleged violation of a condition of the plea agreement, as the defendant acknowledged that he had a right to a hearing and agreed to waive this right. Further, the court providently exercised its discretion in finding, upon the defendant's admission, that he violated a condition of the plea agreement. Under these circumstances, we agree with the court's determination to impose an enhanced sentence upon the defendant's conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see People v Valencia, 3 NY3d 714, 716; People v West, 156 AD3d 920; People v McMillan, 112 AD3d 970; People v Cisneros, 43 AD3d 471, 471-472).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Valencia
819 N.E.2d 990 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. West
2017 NY Slip Op 9182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Cisneros
43 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. McMillan
112 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccants-nyappdiv-2019.