People v. McCants

15 A.D.3d 892, 788 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 892 (People v. McCants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McCants, 15 A.D.3d 892, 788 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Monroe County Court (Patricia D. Marks, J.), entered March 16, 2001. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside his sentence.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, the motion is granted, the sentence is set aside, and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for resentencing.

Memorandum: As the People correctly concede, defendant was illegally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2V2 to 5 years, to be served under parole supervision at the Willard Drug Treatment Campus, inasmuch as at the time of sentencing he was subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment (see CPL 410.91 [2]; cf. People v Carlton, 2 AD3d 1353, 1354 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 625 [2004]). We thus agree with defendant that [893]*893County Court erred in denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside his sentence on the ground that it was illegal, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing “in accordance with the law” (CPL 440.20 [4]; cf. People v Boyd, 298 AD2d 300 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 612, 100 NY2d 536 [2003]). Finally, we note that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion based upon the procedural bar set forth in CPL 440.10 (3) (c). That procedural bar applies only to motions made pursuant to section 440.10, and it is undisputed that the instant motion was made pursuant to section 440.20. Present— Hurlbutt, J.P, Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bell-Bradley
2021 NY Slip Op 00761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Matthew NN.
2017 NY Slip Op 8904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
POVOSKI, JR., FRANK J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Povoski
111 A.D.3d 1350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
WORTH, DOUGLAS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Worth
83 A.D.3d 1547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Collier
79 A.D.3d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 892, 788 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccants-nyappdiv-2005.