People v. McCaa

210 A.D.3d 803, 176 N.Y.S.3d 495, 2022 NY Slip Op 06263
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 2022
DocketInd. No. 1275/19
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 A.D.3d 803 (People v. McCaa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McCaa, 210 A.D.3d 803, 176 N.Y.S.3d 495, 2022 NY Slip Op 06263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v McCaa (2022 NY Slip Op 06263)
People v McCaa
2022 NY Slip Op 06263
Decided on November 9, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 9, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2019-11767
(Ind. No. 1275/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Mario McCaa, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), rendered September 16, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

IANNACCI, J.P., RIVERA, ZAYAS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Potomont
2024 NY Slip Op 01562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.3d 803, 176 N.Y.S.3d 495, 2022 NY Slip Op 06263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccaa-nyappdiv-2022.