People v. McBride

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2026
Docket293 KA 24-01969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of People v. McBride (People v. McBride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McBride, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v McBride - 2026 NY Slip Op 02757
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v McBride

2026 NY Slip Op 02757

May 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TINOS MCBRIDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on May 1, 2026

293 KA 24-01969

Present: Lindley, J.P., Curran, Ogden, Nowak, And Delconte, JJ.

SARAH S. HOLT, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (FABIENNE N. SANTACROCE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN P. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MERIDETH H. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered September 11, 2024. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). We affirm. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid or otherwise does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Thomas, 236 AD3d 1357, 1357 [4th Dept 2025]; People v Odle, 233 AD3d 1502, 1502 [4th Dept 2024], lv denied 43 NY3d 965 [2025]), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: May 1, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. McBride, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcbride-nyappdiv-2026.