People v. McAvoy

142 A.D.2d 604, 536 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7378
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McAvoy. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 A.D.2d 605

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered July 8, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for [605]*605leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have considered the claims raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Kunzeman and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McAvoy, 142 A.D.2d 604, 536 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

142 A.D.2d 604 (People v. McAvoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)