People v. McAnuff (Michael)

69 Misc. 3d 129(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51145(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 2020
Docket570466/10
StatusUnpublished

This text of 69 Misc. 3d 129(A) (People v. McAnuff (Michael)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McAnuff (Michael), 69 Misc. 3d 129(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51145(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v McAnuff (2020 NY Slip Op 51145(U)) [*1]

People v McAnuff (Michael)
2020 NY Slip Op 51145(U) [69 Misc 3d 129(A)]
Decided on October 2, 2020
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on October 2, 2020
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Edmead, P.J., Cooper, Higgitt, JJ.
570466/10

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Michael McAnuff, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), rendered January 13, 2010, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), rendered January 13, 2010, reversed, on the law, and the accusatory instrument dismissed.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated because the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]).

Instead of reinstating the accusatory instrument, we dismiss it, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, since defendant has completed his sentence and no penological purpose would be served by remanding for further proceedings in this ten-year old case.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: October 2, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
People v. Tyrell
4 N.E.3d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Misc. 3d 129(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51145(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcanuff-michael-nyappterm-2020.