People v. McAllister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McAllister

248 A.D.2d 641, 669 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2905

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 641 (People v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McAllister, 248 A.D.2d 641, 669 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered May 12, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without holding an evidentiary hearing (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). The defendant’s belated and unsubstantiated claim of innocence, upon which his motion was based, was belied by his earlier admission of guilt during his plea of guilty (see, People v Butler, 198 AD2d 427; People v Smith, 192 AD2d 732).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered May 12, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without holding an evidentiary hearing (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). The defendant’s belated and unsubstantiated claim of innocence, upon which his motion was based, was belied by his earlier admission of guilt during his plea of guilty (see, People v Butler, 198 AD2d 427; People v Smith, 192 AD2d 732).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 641, 669 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcallister-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack