People v. Mazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mazza

134 A.D.2d 373, 520 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 373 (People v. Mazza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mazza, 134 A.D.2d 373, 520 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment and a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, adjudicating him in violation of a sentence of probation imposed on a conviction under indictment No. 2346/82, and convicting him of burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1967/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgment and the judgment are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record herein demonstrates that his decision to plead guilty was made knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently after full consultation with his attorney. Accordingly, vacatur of his pleas is not [374]*374warranted (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, we find that the defendant was properly adjudicated as a prior felony offender. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment and a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, adjudicating him in violation of a sentence of probation imposed on a conviction under indictment No. 2346/82, and convicting him of burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1967/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgment and the judgment are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record herein demonstrates that his decision to plead guilty was made knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently after full consultation with his attorney. Accordingly, vacatur of his pleas is not [374]*374warranted (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, we find that the defendant was properly adjudicated as a prior felony offender. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 373, 520 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mazza-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack