People v. Maza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maza

253 A.D.2d 713, 678 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 713 (People v. Maza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maza, 253 A.D.2d 713, 678 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered May 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 6 months to run concurrently with a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, since the record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and since defendant, after being afforded the opportunity to present his claims both orally and in a written motion, failed to support his claims of coercion with anything other than conclusory allegations (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered May 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 6 months to run concurrently with a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, since the record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and since defendant, after being afforded the opportunity to present his claims both orally and in a written motion, failed to support his claims of coercion with anything other than conclusory allegations (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 713, 678 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maza-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack