People v. Maysonet

38 A.D.3d 1330, 830 N.Y.S.2d 684
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered April 13, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25). Although the contention of defendant that his plea was not knowing, voluntary or intelligent survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Bland, 27 AD3d 1052 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 892 [2006]), defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review by moving to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judg[1331]*1331ment of conviction (see People v Aguayo, 37 AD3d 1081 [2007]; People v Flowers, 31 AD3d 1212 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 848 [2006]). This case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation requirement set forth in People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). Present—Scudder, RJ., Hurlbutt, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Maysonet, 38 A.D.3d 1330, 830 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 1330 (People v. Maysonet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garrett
60 A.D.3d 1389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Ortiz
43 A.D.3d 1348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)