People v. Mayor's Court
1 Wend. 36
Opinion
By the Court,
Nothing less than express assent could have warranted the taking of the verdict in the absence of the plaintiffs. Such assent could not be inferred from their silence. Besides, it is evident that the plaintiffs wished to be present at the coming in of the jury, which might have been desired for the purpose of submitting to a nonsuit; a right the plaintiffs were entitled to, and which, in this case, they were deprived of. The motion is granted, the record to be amended conformable to special directions drawn up by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Mayor's Court, 1 Wend. 36 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 36 (People v. Mayor's Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schintzuis v. . Lackawanna Steel Co.
120 N.E. 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Floody v. Great Northern Railway Co.
116 N.W. 107 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Washburn v. Allen
77 Me. 344 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1885)
Stiles v. Ford
2 Colo. 128 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1873)
Stevenson v. Cofferin
20 N.H. 288 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Judge of Probate v. Abbot
13 N.H. 21 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1842)
Wooster v. Burr
2 Wend. 295 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)