People v. Mayo

77 A.D.3d 683, 908 N.Y.S.2d 353
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 77 A.D.3d 683 (People v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mayo, 77 A.D.3d 683, 908 N.Y.S.2d 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered April 16, 2009, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was [684]*684ineffective, as there is no indication in the record that the defendant understood the distinction between the right to appeal and other trial rights forfeited incident to a plea of guilty (see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; People v Olivier, 48 AD3d 486 [2008]; People v Cieslewicz, 45 AD3d 1344, 1345 [2007]).

While the defendant pleaded guilty to attempted felony murder, a “nonexistent” (People v Martinez, 81 NY2d 810, 811 [1993]) or “logically and legally impossible” (People v Foster, 19 NY2d 150, 152 [1967]) crime, the plea was permissible since it was “in satisfaction of an indictment charging a crime with a heavier penalty” (People v Martinez, 81 NY2d at 812; see Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [a]; [3] [a]; § 70.02. [1] [a]; [2] [a]; [3] [a]; § 125.25 [3]; People v Foster, 19 NY2d at 152-153; People v McFadden, 28 AD3d 1245 [2006]; People v Guishard, 15 AD3d 731, 732 [2005]; cf. People v Lopez, 45 AD3d 493, 494 [2007]; People v Hassin, 48 AD2d 705 [1975]). Furthermore, contrary to the defendant’s contention that his plea allocution was factually insufficient, where, as here, the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser crime than the one charged in the indictment and the allocution establishes that the defendant understood the charges against him, a factual basis for the plea is unnecessary (see People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950 [1972]; People v Billings, 60 AD3d 961, 962 [2009]; People v Richardson, 50 AD3d 704 [2008]; People v Martin, 239 AD2d 436, 437 [1997]). Santucci, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Medina
2017 NY Slip Op 5244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Husain (Shanzeb)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
People v. Husain
56 Misc. 3d 73 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Johnson
140 A.D.3d 1188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Burnett-Hicks
133 A.D.3d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Williams
131 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Gordon
127 A.D.3d 1230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Cantarero
123 A.D.3d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Clark
118 A.D.3d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Barrett
105 A.D.3d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. McKenzie
98 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Jacob
94 A.D.3d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Foster
87 A.D.3d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.3d 683, 908 N.Y.S.2d 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mayo-nyappdiv-2010.