People v. Mayhood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mayhood

27 A.D.3d 579, 810 N.Y.S.2d 369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.3d 579 (People v. Mayhood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mayhood, 27 A.D.3d 579, 810 N.Y.S.2d 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), imposed September 13, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As part of his plea agreement, the defendant effectively waived appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), imposed September 13, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As part of his plea agreement, the defendant effectively waived appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 579, 810 N.Y.S.2d 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mayhood-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack