People v. Maye

71 A.D.3d 1442, 895 N.Y.S.2d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Maye. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 A.D.3d 556

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell E Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered March 31, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.03 [3]). Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to withdraw the plea, which was based upon his alleged lack of knowledge at the time of the plea that the victim was unable to identify him. “[D]efendant [was] not entitled to withdraw his . . . plea merely because he discovered] that he misapprehended the quality of the [People’s] case” (People v Murdock, 27 AD3d 1170, 1171 [2006] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Maye, 71 A.D.3d 1442, 895 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

71 A.D.3d 1442 (People v. Maye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Murdock
27 A.D.3d 1170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)