People v. May

129 A.D.2d 589, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45267

This text of 129 A.D.2d 589 (People v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. May, 129 A.D.2d 589, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered November 28, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record reveals that his sentence—the statutory minimum—cannot be characterized as unduly harsh or excessive. We further note that the sentence imposed was that which was promised when the plea was accepted (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D.2d 589, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-may-nyappdiv-1987.