People v. Maxwell

142 A.D.3d 739, 36 N.Y.S.3d 832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 25, 2016
Docket107702
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 142 A.D.3d 739 (People v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Maxwell, 142 A.D.3d 739, 36 N.Y.S.3d 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

— Aarons, J.

*740 Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered January 16, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the second degree and escape in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree and escape in the first degree in full satisfaction of a four-count indictment, and his plea agreement included the waiver of the right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to the agreed-upon prison terms of five years on the assault conviction, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and 2 to 4 years on the escape conviction, the sentences to run consecutively. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Initially, we agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid, inasmuch as the record does not establish that defendant understood that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). As such, his challenge to the severity of his sentences is properly before us. Nonetheless, our review of the record does not reveal an abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the agreed-upon sentences in the interest of justice (see People v Filion, 134 AD3d 1244, 1245 [2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 996 [2016]; People v Anderson, 129 AD3d 1385, 1385 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 965 [2015]).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Morehouse
2020 NY Slip Op 3048 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Suddard
2018 NY Slip Op 5630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Treceno
2018 NY Slip Op 2679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Georges
2017 NY Slip Op 5129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Walley
2017 NY Slip Op 3570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A.D.3d 739, 36 N.Y.S.3d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maxwell-nyappdiv-2016.