People v. Maxwell

63 A.D.3d 707, 879 N.Y.S.2d 346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Maxwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 A.D.3d 1108

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers J.), dated January 4, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s contention that the assessment of points for risk factor 1 based upon his use of forcible compulsion constituted improper “double counting” because he also was assessed points for risk factor 5 based upon the victim’s age is without merit (see People v Mendez, 60 AD3d 923 [2009]; see also People v Pietarniello, 53 AD3d 475, 476 [2008]). Furthermore, the People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant engaged in forcible compulsion in the commission of his sex offense (see Penal Law § 130.00 [8] [b]; People v Scanlon, 52 AD3d 1035 [2008]; People v Vasquez, 49 AD3d 1282 [2008]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly assessed those points, and properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender. Spolzino, J.P, Santucci, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Maxwell, 63 A.D.3d 707, 879 N.Y.S.2d 346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 707 (People v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vasquez
49 A.D.3d 1282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Scanlon
52 A.D.3d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Pietarniello
53 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Mendez
60 A.D.3d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)