People v. Maxson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maxson

190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1351

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·Published

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the presentence investigation report improperly recommended a specific length of imprisonment (see, 9 NYCRR 350.7 [b] [6] [i]). The sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the presentence investigation report improperly recommended a specific length of imprisonment (see, 9 NYCRR 350.7 [b] [6] [i]). The sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Maxson, 190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

190 A.D.2d 1090 (People v. Maxson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.