People v. Maxson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maxson

190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1090 (People v. Maxson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maxson, 190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the presentence investigation report improperly recommended a specific length of imprisonment (see, 9 NYCRR 350.7 [b] [6] [i]). The sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the presentence investigation report improperly recommended a specific length of imprisonment (see, 9 NYCRR 350.7 [b] [6] [i]). The sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maxson-nyappdiv-1993.