People v. Maurice Jones

194 N.W.2d 534, 37 Mich. App. 283, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1202
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 1971·No. Docket 11436·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with attempt to take indecent liberties with (MCLA § 750-.336 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.568]), and having carnal knowledge of, a minor under 16 years of age (MCLA § 750.520 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788]).

On October 13, 1970, a hearing was held before a judge of the recorder’s court at which time defendant purported to offer a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of attempt to take indecent liberties with a minor. The judge informed defendant, before plea was entered, that the maximum sentence he could receive was five years. Defendant proceeded to unequivocally waive, both orally and in writing, his right to trial by jury. The court then conducted proceedings as though defendant had pled guilty. On November 4, 1970, defendant was sentenced to serve from 2-1/2 to 5 years. On February 22, 1971, the court set aside the sentence which had been imposed on November 4,1970, and imposed a new sentence of from 2-1/2 to 10 years. The judge explained that he had erroneously believed the maximum sentence under the indecent liberties statute was five years where in actuality it was ten. Defendant’s attorney indicated that perhaps defendant would *285 like to withdraw his plea because it was entered on the belief that attempt to take indecent liberties carried a maximum sentence of five years. The court, nevertheless reformed defendant’s sentence from a maximum of five to a maximum of ten years.

It has been held that the requirement of GCR 1963, 785.3, that the defendant be informed of the consequences of his plea does not require that the defendant be informed of the maximum or minimum sentences to which his plea will subject him as long as the defendant knows he is subject to punishment. People v. McFarland (1969), 17 Mich App 599. Even though the court was not required to volunteer the maximum statutory sentence in this case, the court did so, erroneously informing defendant. It appears to this Court that the policy of GCR 1963, 785.3, in requiring that the defendant be apprised of the consequences of his plea implies that the defendant not suffer misfortune because of a misstatement of the consequences of his plea by the court. Because of defendant’s apparent reliance on the representation of the court, it was error for the court to reform defendant’s sentence in the manner here attempted.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Maurice Jones, 194 N.W.2d 534, 37 Mich. App. 283, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1202 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

194 N.W.2d 534 (People v. Maurice Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People of Michigan v. Derrivis Leonard Parker
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2014
People v. Sundling
395 N.W.2d 308 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Gray
336 N.W.2d 491 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
State v. Boone
298 N.W.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1980)
People v. Chandler
230 N.W.2d 16 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Poindexter
205 N.W.2d 235 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)