People v. Maula

170 A.D.2d 259, 565 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Maula. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 A.D.2d 180

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, [260]*260Bronx County (Vincent Vitale, J.), rendered on October 23, 1990, convicting defendant, after a trial by jury, of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing defendant to a definite term of imprisonment of one year, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Maula, 170 A.D.2d 259, 565 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 259 (People v. Maula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)