People v. Matyas (Cynthia)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 51834(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Matyas (Cynthia) (People v. Matyas (Cynthia)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Matyas (Cynthia), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Cynthia Matyas, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Herman Klarsfeld, J.H.O.), rendered April 7, 2015, convicting her, upon her plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Herman Klarsfeld, J.H.O.), rendered April 7, 2015, reversed, on the law, and the accusatory instrument dismissed.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived her Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 18, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Matyas (Cynthia), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-matyas-cynthia-nyappterm-2019.