People v. Matthews
89 A.D.3d 486, 932 N.Y.2d 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Matthews. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 A.D.3d 1008 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2011·Published
Opinion
At the time he filed his application, defendant was eligible for consideration for resentencing even though he had been released from custody on his drug convictions but reincarcerated for parole violations (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238 [2011]). That he was released on parole again while this appeal was pending did not bar defendant from obtaining resentencing (see People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 246 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Matthews, 89 A.D.3d 486, 932 N.Y.2d 336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 486 (People v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Paulin
952 N.E.2d 1028 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Santiago
952 N.E.2d 481 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)