People v. Matthews

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Matthews

594 N.E.2d 930, 79 N.Y.2d 1010, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1460

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 5, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 594 N.E.2d 930 (People v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Matthews, 594 N.E.2d 930, 79 N.Y.2d 1010, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1460 (N.Y. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve for review his principal contentions that the motion for a severance was improperly denied and that the trial court’s charge did not adequately caution the jury to consider the evidence pertaining to each count of the indictment separately. Defendant’s other contentions present no basis for reversal.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve for review his principal contentions that the motion for a severance was improperly denied and that the trial court’s charge did not adequately caution the jury to consider the evidence pertaining to each count of the indictment separately. Defendant’s other contentions present no basis for reversal.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 N.E.2d 930, 79 N.Y.2d 1010, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-matthews-ny-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack