People v. Matias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Matias

235 A.D.2d 298, 653 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 298 (People v. Matias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Matias, 235 A.D.2d 298, 653 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered June 2, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years to life, to run concurrently with a term of 5 to 15 years for the weapon possession conviction, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly declined to charge the jury on justification. The only evidence supporting such an instruction was defendant’s vague statement to the police that the "older one” was advancing towards him with a knife while defendant and his friend were armed with guns. Moreover, there was ample opportunity for defendant to retreat from the apartment (People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299). Although a knife was recovered, the circumstances of its recovery did not support defendant’s contentions.

The court also properly declined to deliver an intoxication charge. Defendant was not entitled to such a charge based on a witness’s testimony that he appeared "drunk” and defendant’s post-arrest statement to the police that he had ingested one tab of mescaline and some alcohol and had smoked marijuana prior to the shooting, since there was no evidence tending to corroborate his claim of intoxication such as the quantity or quality of the marijuana and alcohol nor any expert testimony regarding the effect of mescaline or its duration (People v Gaines, 83 NY2d 925).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered June 2, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years to life, to run concurrently with a term of 5 to 15 years for the weapon possession conviction, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly declined to charge the jury on justification. The only evidence supporting such an instruction was defendant’s vague statement to the police that the "older one” was advancing towards him with a knife while defendant and his friend were armed with guns. Moreover, there was ample opportunity for defendant to retreat from the apartment (People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299). Although a knife was recovered, the circumstances of its recovery did not support defendant’s contentions.

The court also properly declined to deliver an intoxication charge. Defendant was not entitled to such a charge based on a witness’s testimony that he appeared "drunk” and defendant’s post-arrest statement to the police that he had ingested one tab of mescaline and some alcohol and had smoked marijuana prior to the shooting, since there was no evidence tending to corroborate his claim of intoxication such as the quantity or quality of the marijuana and alcohol nor any expert testimony regarding the effect of mescaline or its duration (People v Gaines, 83 NY2d 925).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 298, 653 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-matias-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack