People v. Mathurin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mathurin

186 A.D.2d 825, 589 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Mathurin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mathurin, 186 A.D.2d 825, 589 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), rendered October 10, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[826]*826Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Eiber, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), rendered October 10, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[826]*826Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Eiber, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 825, 589 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mathurin-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack