People v. Mathison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mathison

282 A.D.2d 283, 722 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3626

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 283 (People v. Mathison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mathison, 282 A.D.2d 283, 722 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., on motion; William Wetzel, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 24, 1999, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, held in abeyance and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress physical and identification evidence.

As the People correctly concede, defendant made a sufficient showing to warrant a hearing on his suppression motion (People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988). Concur — Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., on motion; William Wetzel, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 24, 1999, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, held in abeyance and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress physical and identification evidence.

As the People correctly concede, defendant made a sufficient showing to warrant a hearing on his suppression motion (People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988). Concur — Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 283, 722 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mathison-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack