People v. Mateo

2024 NY Slip Op 02606
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2024
DocketInd. No. 2038/19 Appeal No. 2227 Case No. 2023-00460
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 02606 (People v. Mateo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mateo, 2024 NY Slip Op 02606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Mateo (2024 NY Slip Op 02606)
People v Mateo
2024 NY Slip Op 02606
Decided on May 09, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 09, 2024
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Ind. No. 2038/19 Appeal No. 2227 Case No. 2023-00460

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Victor Mateo, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Leanna J. Duncan of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Triffon of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), rendered February 10, 2022, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 23 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]), which forecloses review of his challenge to the waiver of his right to be personally present at sentencing. Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, his claim is unpreserved, and we decline to address it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the record establishes that defendant had expressly and validly waived his right to be present (see People v Rossborough, 27 NY3d 485 [2016]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 9, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Ronald D. Rossborough
54 N.E.3d 71 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 02606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mateo-nyappdiv-2024.