People v. Mateo

266 A.D.2d 934, 698 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11962
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mateo. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 965

Opinion

—Motion to renew motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: The motion of defendant to renew his prior motion for a change of venue is denied. Defendant has failed to show that pretrial publicity has permeated the community to the extent that it is impossible for defendant to obtain a fair and impartial trial (see, People v Ryan, 151 AD2d 528, 529). Further, we reject as speculative defendant’s contention that members of the jury may experience delayed recall. Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ. (Filed Oct. 4, 1999.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mateo, 266 A.D.2d 934, 698 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Mateo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ryan
151 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)