People v. Mateo

220 A.D.2d 776, 633 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10527
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mateo. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 965

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered October 18, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. .

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; see also, People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mateo, 220 A.D.2d 776, 633 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 776 (People v. Mateo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Burk
181 A.D.2d 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)