People v. Mateo

2 N.Y.3d 786
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mateo. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 N.Y.3d 383
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2004·Published

Opinion

2 N.Y.3d 786 (2004)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v
ANGEL MATEO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted April 19, 2004.
Decided May 11, 2004.

Motion dismissed upon the ground that no action or proceeding is presently pending before the Court of Appeals (see People v Smith, 63 NY2d 896). An application to enforce this Court's remittitur, if such application properly lies, is by appeal, not motion (see Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 122 [3d ed]).

*787 Judge READ taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 786 (N.Y. 2004).

2 N.Y.3d 786 (People v. Mateo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
472 N.E.2d 1038 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)