People v. Mastro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mastro

65 A.D.2d 629, 409 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Mastro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mastro, 65 A.D.2d 629, 409 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 2, 1978, convicting him of bribe receiving in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to exceed three years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of six months’ imprisonment. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein. The defendant’s other contention has been considered and has been found to be without merit. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 2, 1978, convicting him of bribe receiving in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to exceed three years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of six months’ imprisonment. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein. The defendant’s other contention has been considered and has been found to be without merit. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 629, 409 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mastro-nyappdiv-1978.