People v. Masterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Masterson

89 A.D.2d 1035, 454 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Masterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Masterson, 89 A.D.2d 1035, 454 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered May 4,1981, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree. Defendant’s contention that his oral admission, relating to an unrelated burglary under investigation and made after Miranda warnings were given but in the absence of counsel and after his arrest on a menacing warrant, should have been suppressed is without merit (Peopte v Angus, 81 AD2d 971, affd 56 NY2d 549). There was no abuse of discretion in denying him youthful offender status or in the sentence imposed in view of his prior criminal history. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered May 4,1981, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree. Defendant’s contention that his oral admission, relating to an unrelated burglary under investigation and made after Miranda warnings were given but in the absence of counsel and after his arrest on a menacing warrant, should have been suppressed is without merit (Peopte v Angus, 81 AD2d 971, affd 56 NY2d 549). There was no abuse of discretion in denying him youthful offender status or in the sentence imposed in view of his prior criminal history. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 1035, 454 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-masterson-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack