People v. Massa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Massa

115 A.D.2d 665, 496 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Massa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Massa, 115 A.D.2d 665, 496 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered October 2, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed from one year’s imprisonment to five years’ probation and 30 days’ imprisonment, the 30 days is to be a condition of and run concurrently with the period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. We have examined the remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered October 2, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed from one year’s imprisonment to five years’ probation and 30 days’ imprisonment, the 30 days is to be a condition of and run concurrently with the period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. We have examined the remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 665, 496 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-massa-nyappdiv-1985.