People v. Mascitti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mascitti

115 A.D.2d 942, 497 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 942 (People v. Mascitti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mascitti, 115 A.D.2d 942, 497 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to defendant (see, People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 529), the failure to grant defendant’s request to charge the jury on innocent possession of a firearm does not constitute reversible error. There is no proof in the record showing that defendant had a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession. He acknowledged that while other people were present in a relatively small room, he became agitated, said he was going to shoot the clock, picked up the gun which he knew contained bullets, aimed it at the clock and pulled the trigger. The gun discharged and a bullet struck the clock. On such evidence, an innocent possession charge was not warranted (see, People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043).

All concur, except Callahan and Schnepp, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial, in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to defendant (see, People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 529), the failure to grant defendant’s request to charge the jury on innocent possession of a firearm does not constitute reversible error. There is no proof in the record showing that defendant had a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession. He acknowledged that while other people were present in a relatively small room, he became agitated, said he was going to shoot the clock, picked up the gun which he knew contained bullets, aimed it at the clock and pulled the trigger. The gun discharged and a bullet struck the clock. On such evidence, an innocent possession charge was not warranted (see, People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043).

All concur, except Callahan and Schnepp, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial, in the following memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 942, 497 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mascitti-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack