People v. Mascall

2017 NY Slip Op 559, 146 A.D.3d 689, 46 N.Y.S.3d 839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mascall. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.3d 525
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2017·No. 1831/10 2884A 87/11 2884·Published

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stephen J. Barrett, J.), rendered June 28, 2013, convicting defendant, upon her pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and assault in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of six months, concurrent with five years’ probation on the drug sale count, unanimously affirmed.

The court correctly denied defendant’s suppression motion, without granting a hearing. Defendant failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that an aerosol can, allegedly used as a weapon, was recovered from her person or from any place in which she had a legitimate expectation of privacy (see People v Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 NY2d 99, 108 [1996]; People v Rodriguez, *690 69 NY2d 159, 161 [1987]). Defendant claimed to have been unlawfully searched by the police, but she did not specifically claim that this search yielded any evidence. Despite ample opportunity to do so, she did not dispute the People’s claim that an officer recovered the can from the floor in an apartment building hallway. Defendant’s argument that her moving papers implicitly claimed that the can was taken from her person is unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Saxe, Moskowitz and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mascall, 2017 NY Slip Op 559, 146 A.D.3d 689, 46 N.Y.S.3d 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 559 (People v. Mascall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramirez-Portoreal
666 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Rodriguez
505 N.E.2d 586 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)