People v. Mas
110 A.D.2d 915, 488 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48820
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1985·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[916]*916Defendant’s confession, made after his companion made a statement implicating defendant in a prior robbery, was so attenuated as to dissipate any taint which might have resulted from his arrest (see, Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590; People v Calhoun, 78 AD2d 658). Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Mas, 110 A.D.2d 915, 488 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 915 (People v. Mas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McCloud
247 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Jones
151 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Williams
141 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Green
134 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Davis
120 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)