People v. Maryland
This text of 115 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), rendered December 1, 1983, convicting him of bribery in the second degree, promoting prison contraband in the second degree and unlawful possession of marihuana, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The evidence at trial clearly proved that defendant made an offer of money to the correction officers who had caught him receiving contraband, in exchange for their not pressing charges against him and his girlfriend. The essential elements of bribery were thus established (Penal Law § 200.00; see, People v Graham, 57 AD2d 478, 482, affd 44 NY2d 768; People v Brown, 48 AD2d 95, 96, affd 40 NY2d 381, cert denied sub nom. New York v Brown, 433 US 913; cf. People v Charles, 61 NY2d 321, 326; People v Harvey, 235 NY 282, 287). Defendant’s contention that the officers were obligated to further investigate the bribe offer is without merit. Efforts by law enforcement officials to either elicit and record on tape subsequent offers, or to arrange a passing of money, while helpful to the fact-finding process, are not required to prove bribery (see, People v Harvey, supra, p 287). Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 624, 496 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maryland-nyappdiv-1985.