People v. Marturano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Marturano

24 A.D.2d 733, 263 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 733 (People v. Marturano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Marturano, 24 A.D.2d 733, 263 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted and trial of indictment removed from County Court of Oswego County to a term of the Supreme Court to be held in Lewis County. Memorandum: The release and publication of the decision of Oswego County Court denying defendant’s motion to suppress (1) certain statements alleged to have been made by him and (2) alleged evidentiary leads (articles of clothing) obtained at the time of such questioning may well have prejudiced defendant’s right to a fair trial in the county of venue. Therein the court made detailed findings in favor of the People and against the defendant upon testimony of witnesses called by the respective parties that presented sharp factual issues. It would have been preferable to follow the procedure outlined in People v. La Belle (44 Misc 2d 324, 327, 330). All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted and trial of indictment removed from County Court of Oswego County to a term of the Supreme Court to be held in Lewis County. Memorandum: The release and publication of the decision of Oswego County Court denying defendant’s motion to suppress (1) certain statements alleged to have been made by him and (2) alleged evidentiary leads (articles of clothing) obtained at the time of such questioning may well have prejudiced defendant’s right to a fair trial in the county of venue. Therein the court made detailed findings in favor of the People and against the defendant upon testimony of witnesses called by the respective parties that presented sharp factual issues. It would have been preferable to follow the procedure outlined in People v. La Belle (44 Misc 2d 324, 327, 330). All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 733, 263 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marturano-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack